Real Estate to play key role in ASEAN Nations


The real estate industry will have a key role to play in the on-going development of the ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) group of nations, according to Jones Lang LaSalle, whose senior leaders Chris Fossick and Suphin Mechuchep attended the World Economic Forum on East Asia 2012, held in Bangkok at the end of May.

Chris Fossick, Managing Director Jones Lang LaSalle South East Asia said: “The calibre of the attendees, which included senior politicians, academics and business leaders, was testament to the commitment within the region to reaching ASEAN’s objective of economic integration by 2015. What was clear from the discussions throughout the two day forum was that the real estate industry will need to play a vital role in the growth and development of the ASEAN nations. This is a great opportunity and responsibility for all those involved in the industry, be they advisors, investors, developers or occupiers.”

The theme of the Forum was ‘shaping the region’s future through connectivity’ and discussions focused on key areas where connectivity needs to be addressed in order to secure the future economic, political and social success of the ASEAN countries. Jones Lang LaSalle highlighted the ten key areas where smart real estate planning and creation will impact on the success of the ASEAN group:

• Increasing urbanisation: will continue, particularly in the less developed ASEAN nations, resulting in demand for housing, offices, retail space and hotels.
• Improvements in infrastructure: increased connectivity between ASEAN countries and cities will lead to more real estate development.
• Growing affluence: of populations will lead to increased demand for housing.
• Increasing tourism: tourism, both from within and outside of the region, is expected to keep booming in coming years, which will create a significant requirement for more hotels and resorts, particularly in developing countries such as Myanmar and Laos.
• Healthcare: the focus on improving health and the increased spending on healthcare will create a demand for more hospitals and clinics.
• Developing industry and trade: will lead to increased demand for manufacturing and logistics facilities.
• Focus on education: will create the requirement for more schools and colleges.
Investment: will be required for the funding of real estate and infrastructure projects, this will present the opportunity to invest in markets with healthy returns, in comparison to other global markets; this will also lead to the development of established real estate capital markets.
• Land ownership laws: will need to be liberalised to encourage investment in order to fund developments across all sectors.
• Real estate professionals: as real estate development and related activity increases, the region will experience an increased demand for real estate professionals.

Suphin Mechuchep, Managing Director of Jones Lang LaSalle Thailand, who also attended the Forum, said: “Major differences between ASEAN markets such as foreign property ownership, alien business laws and tax system need to be fine-tuned. Once these areas are managed efficiently, the gap in competitiveness among the real estate markets in ASEAN should become narrower, and every market will then be able to capture most, if not all, of the opportunities that will follow the connectivity and collaboration within the sub-region.”

For example, investors from more developed economies in ASEAN should be more confident to expand to property markets in newly opened economies like Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia where new business opportunities are abundant. At the same time, the less matured real estate markets in these countries will benefit from a better inflow of capitals as well as the transfer of tested business process, expertise, know-how and technology. All these are among the key factors that will allow for the faster development of the real estate industry in these less developed economies. While this cooperation will help boost intra-regional investment opportunities, the stronger real estate markets in the sub-region should become more attractive to investors from EMEA and the Americas.”

Source: Property Magazine

Yung Kong export 30% of its steel to Asean markets by 2015.


SUBANG JAYA (June 11, 2012): Yung Kong Galvanised Industries Bhd plans to export 30% of its ColorCoat prepainted steel to Asean markets by 2015, said its managing director Datuk Soh Thian Lai.

“We are looking to export 10% of ColorCoat (prepainted steel) to Asean markets by next year and 30% three years from now,” he told reporters after the signing of a collaboration agreement with Beckers Industrial Coatings (M) Sdn Bhd here on Friday. He said the steelmaker’s current focus is the local market, with exports having a minimal contribution, due to the volatile global economy. The company will begin looking for potential joint venture opportunities in the region next year, possibly in Indonesia or Thailand, after the completion of its new production line in Klang, Selangor in the third quarter of this year. Yung Kong currently has three lines, one in Kuching, Sarawak and two in Klang. Of the Klang lines, one is a new line integrated with a RM30 million continuous colour coating line process. Soh said the new line will be commissioned in Q3 with a 100,000-tonne capacity per year, increasing the company’s revenue and capacity by RM100 million and 50%, respectively. Yung Kong posted a revenue of RM430 million last year. Its ColorCoat products contributed 35% to its overall revenue, which will increase up to 50% with the completion of the new line. Soh said any plans to upgrade the Kuching line with new technology will depend on demand for its products, while the existing line in Klang will be used for potential joint ventures from next year. The sustainable technology collaboration signed with Beckers will spearhead efforts in the production and usage of green building materials, enabling Yung Kong to offer products and solutions that adopt green technology. Part of the collaboration is the integration of the RM30 million continuous colour coating line process, which will reduce production waste and improve efficiency. The collaboration is expected to result in cost savings of 5-10% to Yung Kong. Beckers president of South Asia-Pacific and Middle East, Paul Menezes, said the collaboration will focus on developing energy-efficient design systems for heat reflected steel roofing sheets and walling panels for the building and construction industry.

Source: The Sun Daily

“ASEAN: One Community, One Destiny” Drawing Contest


Drawing Contest

In celebration of the 45th anniversary of ASEAN, a drawing contest will be held for youth in all ten ASEAN Member States from May  to July 2012 with  the theme “ASEAN: One Community, One Destiny”.

Objective

The objective of the contest is to raise ASEAN awareness among ASEAN youths from the early age and to encourage their participation in the celebration of ASEAN’s 45th anniversary on 8 August 2012.

The specific objectives of the contest are:
a.  Promote youth artistic talent and highlight what unites youth around the region;
b.  Promote reflection and understanding of youth on  ASEAN community-building and integration efforts towards the ASEAN Community by 2015 – one community and one destiny; and
c.  Encourage youth participation in ASEAN activities.

Eligibility
The contest is open to young nationals from all ten ASEAN Member States between the ages of 6-12 and 13-18.

Works
 
Drawings must be original and authentic.

The works should be submitted in the format of a drawing representing the values of unity and solidarity with a short caption. The caption should not exceed 2 lines and should be written at the registration form.

The drawings should be sent on an A3 sized paper and should be one-sided in full colour. Water Colour, Crayons, Colour Pencils, etc. can be used to fill the colour.

Deadline for the submission  

All submissions should be sent to the ASEAN National Secretariat in each ASEAN Member State by Friday, 6 July 2012. The address is attached on the registration form and is available on the ASEAN Website: http://www.asean.org/20061.htm

Participants should attach the registration form to the drawing with complete details of  the participant – all must be written in block letters.

No submission will be accepted after the deadline. Only one submission is allowed per participant.

Submissions  received will not be returned  and will be the property of  the ASEAN National Secretariats and the ASEAN Secretariat.

The ASEAN Secretariat reserves the right of usage of the drawings.

Selection

Each ASEAN Member State will select one best submission from each of the following
categories:
a.  One (1) in the 6-12 category; and
b.  One (1) in the 13-18 category

An online version of  these  selected drawings will be displayed on the ASEAN Secretariat facebook page for public viewing.

The most favourite drawings will be selected by the public using the ‘like’ button.  The most favourite  submission  from each category will be announced  at the end of the contest based on the number of ‘likes’ received.

Prizes

The winner of each category will receive certificates signed by the Secretary-General of ASEAN, a cash prize of USD 500 each and ASEAN books and souvenirs. Other participants whose works are selected to represent their respective countries will receive certificates for their participations and prizes equivalent to USD 100.
 
For further information, please contact:

Public Outreach & Civil Society Division
The ASEAN Secretariat
public@asean.org

Please find the registration form below:

Click to access Announcement%20of%20the%20Drawing%20Contest-May%204%20version.pdf

Source: ASEAN Secretariat

The 9th ASEAN-Canada Dialogue to Rejoice the Strong and Sustained Commitment


Bangkok, 8 June 2012


As another vivid testimony to the strong and sustained commitment between ASEAN and Canada who are celebrating 35 years of partnership and friendship in 2012, the 9th ASEAN-Canada Dialogue was held on 7-8 June 2012 in Bangkok, the Kingdom of Thailand.

At the dialogue, the two sides noted with satisfaction the good progress made in the partnership including thorough implementation of the key documents reached between ASEAN and Canada such as the Joint Declaration on ASEAN-Canada Enhanced Partnership, the ASEAN-Canada Joint Declaration on Trade and Investment, and the ASEAN-Canada Plan of Action. In 2012, trade between ASEAN and Canada amounted to US $ 9.8 billion, meanwhile the Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flow from Canada to ASEAN reached US $ 1.6 billion.

Canada reiterated its commitment to and in ASEAN as well as its potential to contribute to the regional peace and stability. In this context, Canada informed ASEAN that it has approached Cambodia as Chair of the ADM Plus to express its desire to join the ADMM Plus. To respond, ASEAN welcomed the decision of Canada to lift economic sanctions on Myanmar following positive developments in the country. Both ASEAN and Canada looked forward to the launch of an ASEAN-Canada Business Council soon in the future.

The dialogue was preceded by a workshop of scholars and administrators from ASEAN and Canada who met to promote people to people connectivity through education and research, and then the recommendations from the workshop were presented to the officials of ASEAN and Canada for consideration. The Workshop was organized by Canada’s international Development Research Centre (IDRC) in cooperation with the Institute of Security and International Studies (ISIS) Thailand.

The Meeting was co-chaired by H.E. Mr. Nopadol Gunavibool, Deputy Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Acting SOM Leader of the Kingdom of Thailand; and Mr. Grant Manuge, Associate Assistant Deputy Minister for the International Business Development, Innovation and Asia Branch of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Trade of Canada.

Source: ASEAN Secretariat

The Sixth Meeting of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) on the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (AHRD)


Yangon, 3-6 June 2012


The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) held its Sixth Meeting on the draft ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (AHRD) on 3 – 6 June 2012 in Yangon, Myanmar. The Meeting was chaired by H.E. Dr. Chet Chealy, Member of the Cambodian Human Rights Committee, the Alternate Representative of Cambodia to AICHR and Chair of AICHR.

AICHR continued its deliberations on the draft AHRD along the guidelines given by the ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting (AMM) and also taking into consideration the many inputs it has received from the Sectoral Bodies during the first Regional Consultation in May 2012 in Bangkok, Thailand.

The Meeting continued to finalise the draft so as to submit to the ASEAN Foreign Ministers at the 45th ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting (AMM) in July, 2012.

AICHR will have its Seventh Meeting on the AHRD in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia on 22 – 23 June 2012. During the course of the Meeting, AICHR will conduct a Regional Consultation with civil society organisations (CSOs) on 22 June. With the fruitful discussion AICHR had with the ASEAN Sectoral Bodies in Bangkok, AICHR also looks forward to the consultation it will have with the CSOs in Kuala Lumpur as well as their constructive contributions to the development of the draft AHRD.

The Meeting expressed appreciation to the Host, the Representative of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar to AICHR, for the hospitality and excellent arrangements for the Meeting.

Source: ASEAN Secretariat

Sir Richard Stone


Famous as Economist
Born on 30 August 1913
Born in London, England
Died on 06 December 1991
Nationality United Kingdom
Works & Achievements Nobel Prize for Economics in 1984

 

Sir John Richard Nicholas (Dick) Stone was an outstanding figure in postwar British applied econometrics. He was one of the pioneering architects of national income accounting and was amongst the first contemporary economists of his generation to distinctively blend theory and application in his approach to economic analysis. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in economics for his significant contributions to the empirical analysis of consumer behavior. His distinctive contribution was however to integrate national income into the double book-keeping format. This technique has been universally accepted as the best way to measure national income. Nowadays, he is often referred to as ‘the father of national income accounting’. A noble prize winner, Sir Richard Stone‘s “Growth Project” created a remarkable macroeconomic model of the British economy. His tenure at the Department of Applied Economics, Cambridge, was instrumental in turning the institute into the best center for applied economics and became a hive attracting top notch economists from around the world.

Sir Richard Stone’s Childhood and Early Years
Sir Richard Stone was born in London on 30th August 1913. He was the only child of Gilbert and Elsie Stone. His school days were spent first at Cliveden Place Preparatory School and then at the Westminster School which he attended from 1926 to 1930. In 1930, Richard Stone’s father was appointed a High Court judge in Madras and, on the advice of his son’s headmaster he took Stone with him. So, Richard Stone had a year’s break in India between school and university.
Education
In 1931, Sir Richard Stone joined Cambridge as an undergraduate student, at his father’s old college, Gonville and Caius. This college was very reputed for its medicine and law departments. However, after two years of studying law he switched to economics. The college didn’t have an economist amongst its Fellows so for the weekly supervisions he was sent to Richard Kahn at King’s College. Not only was Kahn a brilliant theorist but he was a stimulating and encouraging supervisor. Amongst his other professors, Colin Clark who was a lecturer in statistics and who himself was deeply involved in the measurement of national income and Keynes were quite influential cementing his interest in economics.
His performance as an undergraduate student was quite stable unlike his schooling, and in 1935 he received his degree. Soon after, his college offered him a research studentship but he declined the opportunity as he felt that only two years of studying economics was not enough for doing research.
Professional Career
Sir Richard Stone left academics and found a job as a staff member at a firm of Lloyd’s broker. Although he was never really inclined for a business career he did learn a good deal about life from his brief encounter with the insurance world. This job was not so heavy so he could carry on with the kind of work that interested him. So, he spent much of his time with his first wife, who read economics at Cambridge, writing on economic subjects. He and his wife started a little monthly called ‘Trends’ which they distributed as a supplement to the periodical, ‘Industry Illustrated’ run by Colin Clark. In 1937, when Clark left for Australia, he bequeathed the task of running the monthly to Stone. So, following the trend started by Clark, he filled the monthly with indicators of British economic conditions: employment, output, consumption, retail trade, investment, foreign trade, prices and so on. Though ‘Trends’ was a small publication it didn’t fail to attract any attention.
Pre-War
In 1939, Richard Stone was asked to join the staff of the Ministry of Economic Warfare which had to be set up in the event of war. On 2 September he reported to duty when the war broke out and remained there for about nine months in the shipping and oil statistics section. In the summer of 1940 he was transferred to the central economic information service of the offices of the war cabinet where James Meade (a renowned British economist and a 1977 Nobel Prize winner) was preparing the groundwork for a survey of the country’s economic and financial situation and he wanted somebody to help him with the statistical side. The outcome of their joint work was much encouraged by Keynes and was amongst Britain’s first national accounts. These estimates were presented to the Parliament with the Budget of April 1941 and were followed by a number of papers setting out the authors’ ideas. Meade did not pursue the subject, but Stone did, and by the early 1950s his reputation was well established as the ‘Father of the System of National Accounts’. The System was adopted by the OEEC (later OECD) and the UN, which contributed to its universal acceptance.
Post-War
After the war was over in 1945, Stone returned to Cambridge and become the first director of the newly established Department of Applied Economics, created within the faculty of economics and politics at the instigation of Keynes.  But before this he took a three month break at the Institute of Advanced Study in Princeton. Here he spent his time writing on the social accounting system for the measurement of economic flows. The department gained worldwide recognition and attracted many first-rate economists. During the Cambridge years, Stone combined research with teaching and his main fields of interest, apart from national accounting, were the analysis of consumer demand, the great macroeconomic model of the British economy known as the Cambridge Growth Project, and the construction of a system of socio-demographic accounts.
His first paper on the subject, ‘The Analysis of Market Demand’, was read to the Royal Statistical Society and published in its journal in 1945. He continued his work with the help of Deryck Rowe of the National Institute and eventually, two large volumes appeared, the first in 1954, and the second in 1967, titled ‘The Measurement of Consumers Expenditure and Behavior in the United Kingdom, 1920-1938’.
Later Life
During the early 1950s, Sir Richard Stone made a number of trips abroad in connection with the national accounts. In 1950, he visited India with Simon Kuznets and J.B.D. Derksen to advise the National Income Committee on methods of estimation, and in 1952, he spent some time in Athens on a similar task to the Ministry of Coordination. The same year, in July, Stone was called to New York by the UN Statistical Office as they wished to establish a standard system of national accounts. He was chosen as the chairman of the panel. The report was formulated and published by the UN with very little delay as ‘A System of National Accounts and Supporting Tables (SNA)’. In 1968, the new system appeared as ‘A System of National Accounts’. Sir Richard Stone was responsible for writing the first four chapters.
In 1955, Stone gave up the directorship of the Department of Applied Economics as he was appointed the P.D. Leake Professor of Finance and Accounting in the University. By the end of the 1950s, Stone deemed it a good idea to bring together various studies that were in progress at the department and build up an econometric model of the British economy. This was the start of the Cambridge Growth Project. In 1962, Stone and Alan Brown, his colleague at the department since 1952, published the opening volume of the series “A Program for Growth”.
In 1956, after Stones second wife passed away, he married again in 1960. His third wife, although not trained as an economist, had been his partner in all his work for nearly twenty five years. He wrote two books with her—‘Social Accounting and Economic Models (1959)’ and ‘National Income and Expenditure (1961)’. Stone went on to write five more editions of the latter, the last one appearing in 1977. His wife Giovanna played a large role in editing the twelve volumes of ‘A Programme for Growth’.
Sir Richard Stone continued to work on education and eventually was asked by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development to prepare a report titled ‘Demographic accounting and Model building’. This was published by the OECD in 1971. In 1970, the UN statistical office appointed him a consultant which resulted in a report titled ‘Towards a System of Social and Demographic Statistics (SSDS)’ published in 1975.
Sir Richard Stone was a leading applied economist in Cambridge and his influence on and contribution to the development of econometric analysis through the post war years has been immense. He was honored with a knighthood in 1978 and, two years later, he retired from his university post due to deteriorating health. In 1984, he was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in economic Sciences.
Personal Life And Death
In 1936, Sir Richard Stone married Winifred Mary Jenkins. She had also read economics and with her Stone ran a monthly economic supplement called the ‘Trends’. In 1940, after his marriage with Mary Jenkins was dissolved, he married Feodora Leontinoff. She had a background in philosophy and in 1939 she had become the secretary of the ‘National Institute of Economic And Social Research’. In 1956, Feodara died of a long illness she was suffering from. In 1960, Stone married again to Giovanna Croftmurray, great grandchild of Italian patriot Aurelio Saffi.  Though not a trained economist, she was his partner for about twenty five years. She played a large role in editing his major works “A Programme for Growth” In his last years, Sir Richard stone was plagued by ill health. He had the devoted support of his wife Giovanna and his friends. Stone died on 6 December 1991 at the age of 78 in Cambridge. He is survived by his wife Giovanna and his daughter Caroline.
Sir Richard Stone
Sir Richard Stone

Sir Richard Stone Timeline:

1913 – Sir Richard Stone was born in London
1926 -1930 – He attended Westminster School
1930 – He took a one year break in India before university
1931-1935 – Undergraduate student at Cambridge, Gonville and Caius College
1935 – Joined the firm Lloyds broker
1936 – Married his first wife Winifred Mary Jenkins
1937 – Worked on a monthly economic supplement “Trends”
1939 – Joined the staff of Ministry of Economic warfare.
1940 – Marriage with Mary Jenkins was dissolved
1940 – Married his second wife Feodora Leontinoff
1945 – Returned to Cambridge after the war and became the first director of the newly established Department of Applied Economics
1945 – Published his first research paper “The Analysis of Market Demand”
1950 – Visited India with Simon Kuznets and J.B.D. Derksen to advise the National Income Committee
1952 – Spent some time in Athens on a task to the Ministry of Coordination
1955 – Appointed the P.D. Leake Professor of Finance and Accounting in the Cambridge University
1956– Death of second wife Feodora Leontinoff
1960– Third marriage to Giovanna Croftmurray
1962– Published the opening volume for “A Programme For Growth”
1970 – Called in by the UN statistical office as a consultant
1978 – Honored with knighthood
1980 – Retired from the university due to ill health
1984 – Awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences
1991 – Died in Cambridge
Source: The Famous People.Com

William Vickrey


Famous as Economist
Born on 21 June 1914
Born in Victoria, British Columbia
Died on 11 October 1996
Nationality Canada
Works & Achievements Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics in 1996, “Vickrey Auction” Theory,

 

Renowned post Keynesian economist and Nobel Laureate William Spencer Vickrey has is a name to reckon with in the field of economics. A professor by profession, Vickrey had a strong concern for social problems and this was often reflected in his work. He indulged into extensive research in the domains of public utilities, transportation, congestion pricing, urban problems. Being a Quaker, he chose to be a conscientious objector during World War II, and volunteered to restyle the tax systems for Puerto Rico and Japan. His Ph.D. thesis “Agenda for Progressive Taxation” serves as a sort of classic for economics even today. William Vickrey studied “asymmetric information”, where the buyer and seller have unequal information about a transaction. This theory is now popularly known as the “Vickrey Auction”. Vickrey was far from being the stifling academician. He was more practical and insightful, he roller-skated between buildings on the Columbia University and he would pretend to fall asleep during college lectures and interrupt to ask the most intelligent questions. A detailed sketch of William Vickreys personal and professional life is outlined below.

William Vickrey’s Childhood and Early Life
William S. Vickrey was born in Victoria, British Columbia, in 1914. His family moved from Canada to New York when he was three months old. He finished high school from Phillips Andover Academy in Andover, Massachusetts in the year 1931. He then obtained a B.S. in mathematics from Yale in 1935. This was followed by a degree in economics at Columbia University as well as an M.A. degree from 1935 to 1937. William Vickrey remained at Columbia University where he taught for much of his career. He received his Ph.D. degree in 1947 after completion of his 496-page “Agenda for Progressive Taxation” dissertation.
Career
After graduating from Columbia University with an M.A. in 1937, Vickrey worked for the National Resources Planning Board in Washington and the Division of Tax Research in the U.S. Treasury Department. For the intervening ten years, including the World War II, he worked on taxation and public utility pricing and held various research and advisory positions related to taxation.
In 1946, he joined Columbia University as a lecturer of economics. He never left Columbia University for much of his life, and there, most of his career was devoted to teaching and research. In 1947, he was awarded the Ph.D. and in 1948, he became an assistant professor. In 1950, Vickrey was promoted to associate professor, professor in 1958 and McVickar professor of political economy in 1971. From 1964 to 1967, he served as the chairman of the Department of Economics. Since 1982, he served as the Emeritus professor and continued to teach occasional courses and interact with students and colleagues at seminars and conferences.
In 1949, William Vickrey and his Columbia colleague laid the foundations of the postwar tax structure for Japan. This was followed by a number of tax missions, markedly to Puerto Rico, Venezuela, and Liberia. He also served as a consultant on fiscal matters for the United Nations for almost a year, working in Singapore, Zambia, Iran, Malaysia, Libya, Ivory Coast, and Surinam. The study on public utilities started with the electric power industry in 1939. In 1951, it gained momentum because of the studies of the transit and subway fares for the Mayor’s Committee for Management Survey of the City of New York. In 1959, William Vickrey went to Washington to make a detailed study of traffic congestion. He also undertook various studies on urban planning and transportation that drove him to India, Argentina, and Venezuela. He also formulated theories for efficient pricing of electricity, municipal services, urban transportation, telephone services, street and road use, and airlines. He also kept up with every possible technological development in the areas by visiting experimental designs on-site and attending conferences.
Vickrey was elected the “Fellow of the Econometric Society” in 1967 and was awarded with an honorary degree by the University of Chicago in 1979. In 1978, he was elected as the “Distinguished Fellow of the American Economic Association” and in 1992, he was chosen as its president. He was a past president of the Metropolitan Economic Association and the Atlantic Economic Association. In 1996, he was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in April and it was in the same year that he was conferred the Nobel Prize in Economic Science. William shared this award with James Mirrlees “for the fundamental contributions to the economic theory of incentives under asymmetric information.”
With a career spanning over sixty years, William Vickrey’s professional life was quite eventful. His work included original contributions over a broad spectrum. His publications included eight books and around 139 articles, 27 reviews and 61 published articles and notes in the 1994 volume published by the Cambridge University Press, titled ‘Public Economies’.
Key Works
Vickrey Auction – A Vickrey auction is a sealed bid second price auction in which the participants simultaneously submit bids. The auctioneer discloses the identity of the highest bidder who is declared the winner. The price paid, however, is the second-highest bid placed. William Vickrey pointed out that bidders have a dominant strategy to bid their true values and the good should be allocated to the person who values it the most. This auction format is often strategically identical to an English auction.
Congestion Pricing – William Vickrey was considered the father of Congestion Pricing. He proposed it in 1952, for the New York City subway system. He recommended that the fares be increased in peak times and in high-traffic sections and be lowered in others. The elected officials considered it risky, and the appropriate technology was not available. Later, he made a similar proposal for road pricing.
Vickrey considered time-of-day pricing as an application of market forces to balance supply and demand. Those who are able can shift their schedules to cheaper hours, reducing congestion, air pollution and energy use – and increasing use of roads or other utilities. “You’re not reducing traffic flow; you’re increasing it, because traffic is spread more evenly over time,” as William Vickrey said. “Even some proponents of congestion pricing don’t understand that.”
His ideas were not well received by those who set public policy as mentioned by Vickrey himself, “People see it as a tax increase, which I think is a gut reaction. When motorists’ time is considered, it’s really a savings.”
He suggested, “One possible detection and billing method would use electronic identifier units carried in each vehicle, which would activate recording devices in or on the road. Computers would sort the information and determine charges; motorists would be billed monthly.” This is exactly how modern Road Pricing systems function.
Income Taxation – William spent his career studying this issue. A strong believer in using the tax system to take money from the rich and give to the poor, William saw that such forced transfers would reduce people’s incentive to work. He highlighted on this issue seriously in his book on ‘Microstatics’.
“There still remains the fact that money income from gainful work is subject to an income tax while imputed income from leisure is not taxed. Accordingly, an income tax tends to make individuals choose leisure in preference to gainful work to an uneconomical extent.”
For that reason, Vickrey favored fairly low marginal tax rates on high-income people.
Marriage and Personal life
William was a Quaker and a member of the Scarsdale Friends Meeting. He married to Cecile Thompson in 1951 and they lived in Hastings-on-Hudson in New York City.
Death
Vickrey passed away in Harrison, New York, USA because of heart failure; just three days after being announced the 1996 Nobel Prize Winner. His Columbia University Economics Department colleague C. Lowell Harris accepted the prize on his posthumous behalf. He told the New York Times on collecting the award: “I have known almost all of the persons who have gotten the Nobel Prize in Economics, and there’s none who has the range of content or subject matter that my friend had.”
Major Works Of William Vickrey
  • “Averaging of Income for Income Tax Purposes”, 1939
  • “Measuring Marginal Utility by Reactions to Risk”, 1945
  • “An Agenda for Progressive Taxation”, 1947
  • “The Limitations of Keynesian Economics”, 1948, Social Research
  • “Stability Through Inflation”, 1954
  • “A Proposal for Revising New York’s Subway Fare System”, 1955, Journal of The Operations Research Society of America
  • “Utility, Strategy, and Social Decision Rules”, 1960
  • “Counter speculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders”, 1961, Journal of Finance
  • “Auction and Bidding Games”, 1962, in Recent Advances in Game Theory
  • “The Problem of Progression”, 1968, University of Florida Law Review
  • “Congestion Theory and Transport Investment”, 1969, AER
  • “Public Economics: Selected Papers”
  • “Fifteen Fatal Fallacies of Financial Fundamentalism A Disquisition on Demand Side Economics”, 1998, Proceedings of the NAS.
William Vickrey
William Vickrey

William Vickrey Timeline:

1914: Born in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
1931: Completed high school from Phillips Andover Academy
1935: Obtained B.S. in mathematics from Yale in 1935
1937: Obtained M.A. in economics from Columbia University in 1937
1947: Received his Ph. D. degree from Columbia University
1948: Became the assistant professor at Columbia University
1950: Became associate professor at Columbia University
1958: Was appointed as the professor
1964 -1967: Chairman of the Department of Economics
1967: Elected Fellow of the Econometric Society
1971: Made the McVickar professor of political economy
1978: Became distinguished Fellow of the American Economic Association
1979: Conferred honorary degree from University of Chicago
1982: Emeritus professor
1992: President of American Economic Association
1994: An amalgam of the books, articles and notes published by the Cambridge university press under the title “Public Economies”
1996: Died in Harrison, New York, USA because of a heart attack; was conferred Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics
Source: The Famous People.Com

Trygve Haavelmo


Famous as Economist
Born on 13 December 1911
Born in Skedsmo, Norway
Died on 28 July 1999
Nationality Norway
Works & Achievements Trygve Haavelmo won the Nobel Prize in 1989.

 

Trygve Haavelmo was a Norwegian economist and a professor who received the Nobel Prize in 1989 for his contributions in the field of economics. He is believed to be the first Nobel Prize awardee for the econometric work. He spent a majority of his life in relative obscurity until he received the Nobel Prize and shot to limelight, particularly in his native Norway. Thereafter, he tried his utmost to avoid publicity and public debate. He was also an excellent teacher continuing for two generations and hence, had a great influence on succeeding Norwegian economists. His students considered him their role model and most of them dreamt of following in his footsteps. Throughout his life he had motivated many students to pursue economics as their field of interest. His intelligence and keen interest in the study of economics gave rise to innovative approaches for the development of economic issues. He opened up econometrics with special emphasis on mathematics and statistics in the formation of economic theories. Taking his work into account he has carved a prominent position for himself in economics. Continue reading to learn more of his life and works.

Trygve Haavelmo’s Childhood And Early Life
Haavelmo was born in Skedsmo near Oslo, Norway, in the year 1911. After completing his primary education, he, in 1930, enrolled at the University of Oslo, eventually graduating with a degree in economics. On the recommendation of Ragnar Frisch, Haavelmo joined Frisch’s Institute of Economics as one of his assistants. He was then appointed the head of computations in the institute, in the year 1935. The next year, along with Jerzy Neyman and Egon Pearson, he studied at the department of statistics at the London University College. He then undertook a study tour to Berlin, Geneva and Oxford in the year 1938.
From 1938 to 1939, he served as a lecturer in Statistics at the University of Aarhus. The following year he received a scholarship and left for the U.S on a study trip, which he thought would not last more than 1 ½ years. During his stay, he spent his time working at the Cowles Commission. He received the Rockefeller fellowship and for a year, he travelled around and worked at Harvard. From 1942-1944, he worked as a statistician at Nortraship’s office in New York and after that he became a commercial secretary at the Norwegian Embassy in Washington D.C, where he worked for two more years. During this period, he worked and published his most notable work on econometrics on which his fame lasts to this day.
Later Life
He then returned to Oslo and took up a job in the trade department and stayed in the University of Oslo till 1979. During his tenure as a professor, his research interests turned to economic theory and published a book titled ‘A Study in the Theory of Economic Evolution’, which was considered to be quite innovative and methodological. It was an excellent study of economic underdevelopment of a country in relation to other countries.
His probability approach in econometrics introduced a basis of probability in the analysis of economic relations. He is particularly known for his work in identification problems and analysis of economic equations. His ideas and theories became an important factor in the research activity at the Cowles Commission, where he worked in 1946, in Chicago. He worked as the head of a division under the Ministry of Finance in Norway, where his job involved coordinating and implementing the post-war planning regime. He also had theoretical interests in macroeconomics. In 1954, his work, ‘A Study in the Theory of Economic Evolution’ brought forward a new approach to economic development issues. In 1960, he published a book titled, ‘A study in the Theory of Investment’, which was linked to the supply side of the capital goods market. Both of these works brought him credit and recognition to some extent.
Major Works
  • The Method of Supplementary Confluent Relations, 1938
  • The Inadequacy of Testing Dynamic Theory by Comparing the Theoretical Solutions and Observed Cycles, 1940
  • Statistical Testing of Business Cycles, 1943
  • The Statistical Implications of a System of Simultaneous Equations, 1943
  • The Probability Approach in Econometrics, 1944
  • Multiplier Effects of a Balanced Budget, 1945
  • Family Expenditures and the Marginal Propensity to Consume, 1947
  • Methods of Measuring the Marginal Propensity to Consume,1947
  • Statistical Analysis of the Demand for Food: Examples of Simultaneous Estimation of Structural Equations, with M.A. Girshick, 1947
  • Family Expenditures and the Marginal Propensity to Consume, 1947
  •  Quantitative Research in Agricultural Economics: The Interdependence between Agriculture and the National Economy, 1947
  • The Notion of Involuntary Economic Decisions,1949
  • A Note on the Theory of Investment, 1950
  • The Concepts of Modern Theories of Inflation, 1951
  • A Study in the Theory of Economic Evolution, 1954
  • The Role of the Econometrician in the Advancement of Economic Theory, 1958
  • Econometrica, A Study in the Theory of Investment, 1960
  • Business Cycles II: Mathematical Models, 1968
  • Variation on a Theme by Gossen, 1972 (Swedish)
  • What Can Static Equilibrium models Tell Us?, 1974
  • Econometrics and the Welfare State, 1990
Haavelmo’s – Probability Approach
The probability approach has been one of his key works, regarded as one of his major contributions. The approach deals with the fact that one should foresee existing economic data as being ‘a sample selected by nature’ and is governed by the reality, which was unnoticeable. He indicated that the validity of economic theories can be tested by framing the theoretical model to the statistical relationships. The approach signifies that the relationship between theory and reality is similar to the relationship between the observed data and that reality. This approach gives a conclusive statistical theory that if we effectively say that we have ‘reproduced’ another ‘natural drawing’ from the reality then the theoretical relationships are more or less true.
Major Contribution
His main contributions were the two articles, one which showed the statistical implications of simultaneous equations and the other which bases econometrics firmly on probability theory. His temporary stay in the US resulted in the book entitled ‘The Probability Approach in Econometrics’. In this he penned many of the methods, which were used in economics but theorized that all these techniques were deceptive. Economics had not acknowledged the interaction of multiple economic relations and economic laws were not rigid. His major contribution was the introduction of a new approach to approximate economic relations by applying mathematical statistics. After this he continued developing his interest towards economic theory. His book ‘A Study in the Theory of Economic Evolution’ dealt with the study of the causes of underdeveloped economy of a specific country in comparison to others. His contribution in the area of economics was the ‘Balanced Budget Multiplier Theorem’, which was a new approach in the business cycle theory.
 
Another major contribution was the ‘Theory of Investment’. His book entitled ‘A Study in the Theory of Investment’ coined the demand for the actual capital, the indisposition in the modification of the real capital. His work and writings on the investment behavior and on environmental economics have inspired further research work, which has led to the development of new theories.
Death
Trygve Haavelmo died at the age of 87, on July 28, 1999, in the city of Oslo, Norway.
Awards & Accolades
In the year 1989, Haavelmo received the Nobel Prize and the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Science for the illumination of the probability theory foundations of econometrics and the analyses of co-occurring economic structures.
Trygve Haavelmo
Trygve Magnus Haavelmo

Trygve Haavelmo Timeline:

1911: Trygve Magnus Haavelmo was born in Skedsmo, Norway.
1930: Enrolled in the University of Oslo.
1933: Obtained a degree in the field of Economics.
1935: Was appointed the head of computations in Frisch’s institute.
1936: Haavelmo studied in the London University College at the Department of Statistics along with Neyman and Pearson.
1938: Went on a study trip to Berlin, Geneva and Oxford.
1938-39: Became a lecturer in statistics at the University of Aarhus and then left for the U.S with a scholarship.
1940-41: Spent time travelling around and working at Harvard University and delivered his work ‘The Probability Approach in Econometrics’.
1942-44: Worked as a statistician in New York at Nortraship’s office and published his work for econometrics.
1944-46: Served as the commercial secretary at the Norwegian Embassy in Washington D.C.
1946: He received his Ph.D. for ‘The Probability Approach in Econometrics’ and worked at the Cowles Commission.
1947: Returned to Norway.
1947-48: He was the head of division in the trade department.
1948: Became a professor at the University of Oslo and remained there until his retirement.
1979: He retired from the University of Oslo and became the professor emeritus.
1989: He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics for his probability theory of econometrics and analyses of simultaneous economic structures.
1999:Haavelmo died on 28 July in Oslo, Norway.
Souce: The Famous People.Com

Emiliano Zapata


Famous as Revolutionary Leader, Founder of the Liberation Army of the South
Born on 08 August 1879
Born in Anenecuilco, Morelos, Mexico
Died on 10 April 1919
Nationality Mexico
Works & Achievements Created and led the revolutionary force, Liberation Army of the South in the Mexican Revolution, Zapata’s revolutionary role has made way for today’s popular revolutionary organizations taking his name to name themselves.

Emiliano Zapata was one of the key figures in carrying forward the Mexican Revolution that started off in 1910. Zapata formed his army and commanded it to fight against the repression by autocracy. He is regarded as one of Mexico’s greatest revolutionary heroes. Zapata created his revolutionary force, the Liberation Army of the South, during the Mexican Revolution. His name features in history and is often taken up by present day Mexican revolutionary organizations. Zapata’s quest was carried forward by other individuals and groups in the Mexican Revolution against Mexican President Porfirio Díaz. Zapata was a leader of the oppressed who fought for common’s man’s fundamental rights. To Mexicans, Zapata was a popular mass figure who fought and sought to implement liberties and agrarian rights for the farmers and indigenous citizens. Such is the impact of the man that even today there are towns, streets, and housing developments called “Emiliano Zapata”. Certain revolutionary movements carried out in the recent tomes by Mexican natives have been named as “the Zapatistas”.

Emiliano Zapata Childhood & Early Years
Emiliano Zapata was born on 8 August 1879 to Gabriel Zapata and Cleofas Salazar of Zacatepillo. His family was of mixed origin, having European and Native American descent. Zapata family was a typical Mestizo family and Emiliano Zapata’s family especially belonged to Nahua and Spanish ancestry. Zapata had nine siblings and he was the ninth among 10 children in his family. Zapata spent a hard and poor childhood having been born to a peasant family. He witnessed severities rampant in his nation since his childhood. Zapata was tutored by his teacher, Emilio Vara and so he had limited education. He had to take responsibilities of his family at a very young age as his father had died when he was 17.
In 1876 Mexico came under the rule of Porfirio Díaz who had risen to power during this time. Mexico had a social and economic system that followed proto-capitalist feudal order. This kind of a social set up had large estates controlling major land areas which resulted in crushing independent land ownership and people’s communities thus leading to common people being thrown into debt slavery in the estates. Diaz ran people’s elections to keep his countrymen pacified. It was under Diaz’s administration that offices in districts throughout Mexico were handed out to Diaz’s personal acquaintances and associates. These district officers enforced land reforms to suit themselves which made the estates go into the hands of wealthy landowners.
Early Years of Revolution
Zapata’s family supported the rule of Porfirio Díaz. They somehow avoided peonage and were able to maintain their own land. As a young boy Zapata was known to meddle in bullfights and rodeos in his elaborate charro (cowboy) outfit. It was in 1906 that Zapata went to a meeting in Cuautla which discussed about the possible ways to defend the lands of the common people. Zapata had worked as a farmhand while taking part in the meeting. Zapata started acting as a rebel and in 1908 his initial acts of rebellion got noticed and he was sent to Cuernavaca after being drafted into the Ninth Regiment. Zapata was a shard horse rider and so he was appointed as a soldier and he remained so only for 6 months before leaving for Mexico City on Ignacio de la Torre’s requiest who had hired Zapata as his groom previously.
In 1909 Zapata’s village Anenecuilco called an important meeting to decide on the next President of the village council as the chief elder of the council, José Merino was resigning from his position due to his old age and growing inabilities to fight for the village people’s land rights. Nominations bore names of Modesto Gonzales, Bartolo Parral, and Emiliano Zapata and after the nominations completed, a single vote (council elders were regarded and respected without any opposition) made Zapata the new council president. Zapata soon became a leading figure in the village of Anenecuilco which was his root. From here Zapata started his struggles for the rights of the campesinos of Morelos. Zapata worked hard to grow important relations with political authority figures. He campaigned for the basic rights of villagers for several years before taking upon armed forces. His campaigns went in vain as the government was slow in response and had strong biases for wealthy plantation owners which led Zapata to take arms and take over the lands in dispute.
1910 Revolution
It was in and around 1910 that Mexican President Porfirio Díaz’s government was threatened by rising candidacy of Francisco I. Madero. Zapata quietly allied with Madero who was rated by Zapata as the only chance to save Mexico and bring in new and real changes within the nation. In 1910 itself Zapata made himself the general of an army which had formed in Morelos called as the “Ejército Libertador del Sur” (Liberation Army of the South). This was a quick move by Zapata that went on to start a great revolution in the coming years.
Zapata became a part of Madero’s campaign against President Diaz. It was with the strong support and assistance of Pancho Villa, Pascual Orozco, Emiliano Zapata and several other rebel farmers that Madero soon overthrew Díaz in May 1911 with the Battle of Ciudad Juárez. After Diaz was cast away a provisional government was formed under Francisco León de la Barra. Madero came to power with promises to start land reforms to which he failed. Zapata was disgusted and utterly dissatisfied with Madero’s inadequacies in implementing land reform in spite of several efforts by Zapata to make Madero understand the importance of the issue and the urgency to act on it.
Zapata started becoming unsure of Madero’s motives as the latter did not implement any radical changes in the agrarian set up during the time. Although Madero did things like giving formal justice in courts to individuals wronged due to oppression is respect to agrarian politics, it was Zapata’s growing worries that Madero was only apparently doing good things for Mexican people and not from within. Zapata increasingly grew suspicious of Madero’s sincerity towards Mexico and for this reason Zapata distanced himself from blindly supporting Madero.
In 1911 Zapata’s doubts and suspicions were confirmed with Madero deciding to appoint a governor to support plantation owners leaving aside Zapata’s persistent pleas to achieve agrarian goals. Madero’s move brought an end to good relation between him and his very trusted Zapata. In November 1911 all moves on compromises failed between Zapata and Madero. Days after the failure Madero chose himself as the President, and Zapata and Montano fled to the mountains of southwest Puebla. Together Zapata and Montano formed the most radical reform plan in Mexico; the Plan de Ayala on 25 November 1911.
Zapata was heavily influenced by anarchist politics. His main source of inspiration came from Ricardo Flores Magón who was a notable anarchist from Oaxaca, Mexico. Much of Zapata’s Plan de Ayala bear influences of Flores Magón’s “Tierra y libertad” or “land and liberty” which was the title and maxim of Flores Magón’s most famous work. The growing anarchist thoughts in Zapata’s school of thought came from a local schoolteacher, Otilio Montaño Sánchez who later became Zapata’s trusted general in Zapata’s army. Sanchez was executed on 17 May 1917 after teaching Zapata the thoughts of Peter Kropotkin and Flores Magón. Zapata learnt a lot about anarchism from Sanchez during his personal quest for participation and bringing changes in the struggles of the peasants for the land.
According to the plans formulated by the Plan de Ayala, Zapatista demands “Reforma, Libertad Ley y Justicia” (Reform, Freedom, Law and Justice) were claimed. Zapata rejected Madero’s governance. Zapata mobilized his Liberation Army and successfully joined hands with former Maderistas who were Pascual Orozco and Emiliano Vázquez Gómez (Madero followers). It was with Orozco’s help (since he lived Chihuahua, near the U.S. border) that Zapatan army got their arms and ammunitions. Military operation developed greatly. With Zapata’s command the Zapatan army thought of attacking Cuautla which was the centre of all fighting. However, Zapata realised the need of better arms and training within his army. According to the line of action in the proposed plan, Zapata’s army started off by gaining a control in the area between Jojutla to Yecapixtla. More raids followed which brought amazing success in Jojutla.
Zapata’s army got a major blow with Torres Burgos, the commander of the operation being shot dead by a federal police patrol. Burgos’ death led the party rebels to choose Zapata as “Supreme Chief of the Revolutionary Movement of the South”. However, there were people within the rebellion army who wanted to replace Zapata. Zapata proved himself and was respected by his peers. Zapata led his army with supreme power and control. He said, “It’s better to die on your feet than to live on your knees”. With this Zapata formed several individual rebel groups and brilliantly increased his margin of success. A meeting between Zapata and Ambrosio Figueroa took place in Jolalpan. Zapata came to the power jointly with Figueroa to operate in Morelos. This worked in the direct overthrow of Morelos and Zapata’s tremendous growth in authority and influence. Zapata started accessing areas in the city with his newly acquired power. Madero was alarmed by Zapata’s growing power and asked the later to disarm and demobilize. Madero sent many of his generals to deal with Zapata but these efforts failed miserably. It felt like Zapata would shortly overthrow Morelos, but then the Treaty of Ciudad Juarez was signed. This officially and formally ended the civil war. This did not end the revolution. There were battles that followed in the years to come.
Zapata could not be defeated in any battle with the government. In 1919 Zapata was defeated in a planned ambush by Gen. Pablo González and his lieutenant, Col. Jesús Guajardo who were supporters of the Mexican president, Venustiano Carranza. A major conspiracy followed with Guajardo asking González to feign a defection to Zapata’s forces to which González promptly agreed. González arranged for Guajardo to attack a Federal column, killing 57 soldiers. Zapata unknowingly received a messenger from Guajardo to discuss Guajardo’s defection.
Death
On 10 April 1919 Guajardo invited Zapata for a meeting. Zapata arrived at the Hacienda de San Juan, in Chinameca, Ayala municipality where Guajardo’s killed him with several bullets.
Emiliano Zapata
Emiliano Zapata

Emiliano Zapata Timeline:

1879 – Emiliano Zapata was born on 8 August
1906 – Zapata went to a meeting in Cuautla which discussed about the possible ways to defend the lands of the common people
1908 – His initial acts of rebellion got noticed and he was sent to Cuernavaca after being drafted into the Ninth Regiment
1909 – Zapata’s village Anenecuilco called an important meeting to decide on the next President of the village council where Zapata was made the President
1910 – Mexican President Porfirio Díaz’s government was threatened by rising candidacy of Francisco I. Madero
1910 – Zapata made himself the general of an army which had formed in Morelos called as the “Ejército Libertador del Sur” (Liberation Army of the South)
1911 – Emiliano Zapata and several other rebel farmers along with Madero soon overthrew Díaz in May with the Battle of Ciudad Juárez
1911 – Zapata’s doubts and suspicions were confirmed with Madero deciding to appoint a governor to support plantation owners leaving aside Zapata’s persistent pleas to achieve agrarian goals
1911 – Together Zapata and Montano formed the most radical reform plan in Mexico; the Plan de Ayala on 25 November
1911 – In November all moves on compromises failed between Zapata and Madero
1917 – Sanchez was executed on 17 May after teaching Zapata the thoughts of Peter Kropotkin and Flores Magón
1919 – Zapata was defeated in a planned ambush by Gen. Pablo González and his lieutenant, Col. Jesús Guajardo who were supporters of the Mexican president, Venustiano Carranza
1919 – On 10 April Zapata was killed by bullets fired at him
Source: The Famous People.Com

William Wallace


Famous as Patriot, Revolutionary Fighter, Knight, De facto Ruler of Scotland
Born on 1270
Born in Elderslie, Renfrewshire, Scotland
Died on 23 August 1305
Nationality Scotland
Works & Achievements Defeated English Army in a major battle of 1297, Served Scotland as the ‘Guardian of Scotland’

 

William Wallace was a formidable Knight, a great nationalist and a brave revolutionary fighter/leader who led Scotland to its victory and made his nation taste brief freedom from the shackles of British rule in the late 13th century. Wallace was a great warrior who fought till he died fighting and was captured and hanged by King Edward I of England in 1305. Wallace is known to be one the finest and first line of leaders to have led the Wars of Scottish Independence. Wallace’s greatness have found many references in literature the notable ones being the literary works by Sir Walter Scott and Jane Porter. William Wallace is a prominent figure in the history of Scotland and his ancient age contribution has found relevance even in the modern times with the Academy Award winning epic film ‘Braveheart’, which was directed by Mel Gibson, being made to depict his life and role as a true war hero. William Wallace led Scotland become a powerful force to reckon with and he became a world figure as his name and deeds started being upheld by several people, common and uncommon around the world. The protagonist of the 15th century epic poem The Acts and Deeds of Sir William Wallace, Knight of Elderslie, by Blind Harry which upholds William Wallace in the poem. Wallace’s name is iconic in the pages of world history.

William Wallace Childhood & Early Life
Dates cannot be confirmed about the birth and the growing years of William Wallace. His family and background also remains quite unclear to historians. A rough sketch of his birth shows that he was born somewhere around 1270 in Elderslie in Renfrewshire which has again been reaffirmed as Ellerslie in Ayrshire in the recent times. He was born to a family of Scottish nobility. His family comprised of feudal landowners. Wallace himself was a minor member of the noble lords of Scotland. William went to the High School of Dundee to receive his formal education. It was in 1297 that a sealed letter, sent to the Hanse city of Lübeck, made his father Alan’s name appear on it. Wallace’s had his brothers Malcolm and John. According to another source, Alan Wallace is known to have been named in a noble and gentries’ Ragman Rolls where Alan is believed to have been a crown tenant in Ayrshire in south west of Scotland. Wallace’s family members held estates at Riccarton, Tarbolton, and Auchincruive in Kyle, and Stenton in Haddingtonshire. During the birth period of Wallace, Scotland was ruled by King Alexander III. During his rule Scotland was a land of peace and stability. There was no evidence of war and it has been recorded that the King of Scotland maintained peaceful terms with the kings of England. Alexander did not let the English rule over Scotland.
Scenario in Scotland leading to the wars
In 1286 Alexander, the then king of Scotland died while riding a horse leaving no survivor to his throne. Alexander’s only survivor (legal heir to the throne) granddaughter Margaret, Maid of Norway who was just 4 years old was declared the Queen by the noble lords of Scotland. An interim government was set up to rule Scotland till Margaret grew up to take up as the Scottish ruler. This made way for the instability of rule in Scotland and King Edward I of England struck upon a plan to formulate the Treaty of Birgham and pledged a future marriage of Margaret to his son, Edward, Prince of Wales. Scotland managed to hold on to its status as a separate kingdom. However, Margaret became ill and died in 1290 while travelling from Norway (her birth land) to Scotland. This led to the starting point of all the wars (that were to follow) military pursuits and battles between the independent Kingdom of Scotland and the Kingdom of England (to make Scotland come under the British rule) in the late 13th and early 14th centuries. Scotland was in the midst of fears of a civil war breaking out when King Edward successfully became Lord Paramount (on 17 November 1292) of Scotland (after his arbitration with the Scottish lords). It was in 1296 that Scottish nobles started be taken as prisoners of war by Edward and his forces. In April and July 1296 Scotland was defeated at the Battle of Dunbar in East Lothian and King Edward removed all Scottish power and took away around 1800 Scottish nobles as prisoners of war.
William Wallace’s arrival
All the accounts of Wallace’s arrival and briefs surrounding the revolutionary leader have been recorded by ‘Blind Harry’ or Henry the Minstrel who is the famous author of “The Actes and Deidis of the Illustre and Vallyeant Campioun Schir William Wallace” (a long poem) which recounts the life of William Wallace.
 
It was in 1291 that William’s father died in a battle that took place in Loudoun Hill. Soon after this an incident occurred where Wallace was stopped from fishing by two British soldiers. Wallace was allegedly asked to give away his catch to the British soldiers when he braved them and fought with a fishing rod before taking away an approaching soldier’s sword. Wallace killed the British soldiers in the fight. Wallace started his life as a revolutionary patriot by killing the son of the English governor of Dundee who had allegedly bullied Wallace and his family. In 1291 or 1292 William allegedly killed the son of an English noble, named Selby, with a short dagger. However there is no real evidence to prove this incident.
William’s actual entry into history was with the assassination of William de Heselrig, the English High Sheriff of Lanark, in May 1297. William had allegedly taken a revenge for the murder (carried out by the Sheriff) of Marion Braidfute of Lamington the young heiress who had married Wallace only recently.
Willaim started with battles at Loudoun Hill (near Darvel, Ayrshire) and Ayr in which he became victorious. Supporters of the Scottish revolution got a major jolt when Scottish nobles came into a pact with the English at Irvine in July 1297. In August 1297 William left his hideout in Selkirk Forest along with his followers and joined Andrew Moray, who had begun another uprising, at Stirling. Together William and Moray made preparations to confront English forces in battle. Soon Wallace gained strength and moved his forces from Selkirk Forest to the Highlands.
Battles 
William led his forces to win the Battle of Stirling Bridge on 11 September 1297. This was the first major battle against the English forces and is recorded as one of the topmost battles in the First War of Scottish Independence. William was accompanied by Andrew Moray to defeat a formidable British challenge that came from a combined British forces comprising of John de Warenne, 7th Earl of Surrey and Hugh de Cressingham who met William’s forces near Stirling. With a minor force William and Moray confronted a huge British professional army of 3,000 cavalry and 8,000 to 10,000 infantry. The war made the Scot revolutionary army bolster a very significant historical victory that raised the confidence of Scottish army. It was William’s captains who led from the forefront to drive away the British forces out of Scotland. The Battle of Stirling Bridge left Moray dead from his war wounds in the 1297 winter.
After returning from the Battle of Stirling Bridge William was knighted. His second-in-command John de Graham was also made a Knight. William Wallace was soon named the “Guardian of Scotland and Leader of its armies”. Within the six months of the victory William led his forces to storm into northern England. William’s aim was to let the English rule take note of the Scottish power.
On 1 April 1298 English Army made an invasion into Roxburgh (or Rosbroch) in Scotland. English Army destroyed Lothian in Scotland but could not capture Wallace or bring him to appear before the British Army. King Edward continued with his search for Wallace.
William arranged his forces dividing them into “schiltrons” (known as sheltron or schiltrom or shiltron) which was a compact troop formation having a shield wall like structure designed for war. It was on 22 July 1298 that another major battle, The Battle of Falkirk took place. William Wallace and his forces were defeated by the English Army led by King Edward I of England. The English Army crushed the Scottish resistance completely. Many Scottish men died in the battle and William escaped leaving his Army disbanded and killed and also earning a bad name.
William decided to step down as Guardian of Scotland in September 1298. Robert Bruce became the new ruler of Scotland (on William’s intimation). However, Bruce arbitrated with the English Army for reconciliation which was not liked and rejected by Wallace. In 1302 Bruce struck a peace move with British King Edward. William hated all the peace moves between Scotland and England. In the late 1298 William Wallace and William Crawford went on their mission to the court of King Philip IV of France for pleading assistance into their revolution which was a major Scottish struggle for independence. In 1303 Squire Guthrie went to France to bring back Wallace and his men to Scotland. Wallace and his men returned to Scotland in 1303. Wallace and his men hid in a farm of William Crawford, near Elcho Wood where they in the darkness of the night. Hearing William Wallace’s arrival English Army moved towards the farm. A chase followed soon after this and the band was captured and surrounded in Elcho Wood. The band of men soon slipped away from British forces. Wallace had reportedly killed one of his men who had allegedly helped the British with their search. In July 1304 Wallace involved himself in British encounters fighting in the Battle of Happrew. In September 1304 William took part in a skirmish, The Action at Earnside which is known to be his last fight.
Death  
William escaped capture by English forces for long but was given away to British forces (every time finding his escape routes) several times resulted by disloyalty of Scottish nobles and knights. It was on 5 August 1305 that John de Menteith, a Scottish knight who had his loyalty to King Edward of England handed over Wallace to English soldiers at Robroyston near Glasgow. William Wallace was taken to London and presented in Westminster Hall where he was tried for treason. William responded to the treason charge, “I could not be a traitor to Edward, for I was never his subject.” On 23 August 1305 William was taken away from the hall, after his trial was completed. He was dragged from the hall, naked and drawn to the heels of a horse before being taken away to the Elms at Smithfield. William’s execution was gruesome as he was hanged and released when he was alive. His abdomen was cut open and his bowels were burnt before him before being beheaded, castrated and cut into four parts. William’s head was dipped in tar and preserved before placing it on a pike atop London Bridge. His limbs were made to display separately, in Newcastle upon Tyne, Berwick-upon-Tweed, Stirling, and Aberdeen.
William Wallace
William Wallace

William Wallace Timeline:

1270 – He was born
1286 – Alexander, the then king of Scotland died while riding a horse leaving no survivor to his throne
1291 – William’s father died in a battle that took place in Loudoun Hill
1291 or 1292 – William allegedly killed the son of an English noble, named Selby, with a short dagger
1297 – William’s actual entry into history was with the assassination of William de Heselrig, the English High Sheriff of Lanark, in May
1297 – Scottish revolution got a major jolt when Scottish nobles came into a pact with the English at Irvine in July
1297 – In August William left his hideout in Selkirk Forest along with his followers and joined Andrew Moray, who had begun another uprising, at Stirling
1297 – William led his forces to win the Battle of Stirling Bridge on 11 September
1297 – The Battle of Stirling Bridge left Moray dead from his war wounds in the winter
1297 – A sealed letter, sent to the Hanse city of Lübeck, made his father Alan’s name appear on it
1298 – On 1 April English Army made an invasion into Roxburgh (or Rosbroch) in Scotland
1298 – On 22 July another major battle, The Battle of Falkirk took place
1298 – William decided to step down as Guardian of Scotland in September
1298 – In the late 1298 William Wallace and William Crawford went on their mission to the court of King Philip IV of France for pleading assistance into their revolution which was a major Scottish struggle for independence
1302 – Robert Bruce struck a peace move with British King Edward
1303 – Squire Guthrie went to France to bring back Wallace and his men to Scotland. Wallace and his men returned to Scotland in 1303
1304 – In July Wallace involved himself in British encounters fighting in the Battle of Happrew.
1304 – In September William took part in a skirmish, The Action at Earnside which is known to be his last fight
1305 – On 5 August John de Menteith, a Scottish knight who had his loyalty to King Edward of England handed over Wallace to English soldiers at Robroyston near Glasgow
1305 – On 23 August William was taken away from the Westminster Hall, after his trial was completed and was executed
Source: The Famous People.Com